Advantages and disadvantages of GOOGLE ACADEMIC

Discover the main advantages and disadvantages of Google Scholar is a search engine of the Google company specialized in scientific and academic searches.

Advantages and Disadvantages of Google Scholar

More about Google Scholar

It is characterized by having a search engine focused on a bibliographic database. That is, most of the results are references to books, articles and texts.

Since its launch in 2004 it is one of the most popular specialized search engines, used by many academics, academics and curious people. In the following article we are going to present a series of advantages and disadvantages of Google Scholar with respect to other specialized search engines.

Advantages of Google Scholar:

  • It offers a lot of information. You can find full texts of articles or book chapters. It also has a series of statistics that allow you to know the impact of each publication.
  • It streamlines research. It allows to speed up the research of university or scientific works, allowing the user to find all types of documents and bibliographic references.
  • Free. It allows access to anyone with an Internet connection. This helps to reduce the cultural gap.
  • Easy to use. It is a search engine with an intuitive interface very similar to the famous search engine Google.

Disadvantages of Google Scholar:

  • Not all languages are available. Google Scholar is not available in all languages. This is a major disadvantage for people researching in languages that are not widely spoken.
  • Confusing information. If the user is not careful, he/she may accept outdated information as current. The search engine provides information but it is not always reliable. This can confuse students.
  • It does not distinguish between sources. It is intended to provide many references. Sometimes this feature can cause files as disparate as a Power Point and a scientific article to be given the same importance.
  • Authorship. New files are frequently being added from researchers with similar surnames. This can lead to authorship confusions that may even penalize one of the researchers.